Mer. LJ has been pissing me off today. That's the second time I did a nice long complicated post and it went away. Ok, anyway.
I didn't sleep well last night. Not only did I worry/cry about things that were over months ago (I still hold that "Your parents are in the hospital" are the scariest words anyone can hear. Maybe not the worst, but the scariest), but I ultimately defined my political views in one single statement:
It's no one's business but yours what you do with your body, time, or money--unless someone else is getting hurtBy using that, it's very easy to make my stand on most things. One area that I had a bit of trouble with, though, was abortion. I've always been rather pro-choice, but--is the unborn baby counted as a person being hurt? It's possible, but there are situations where the baby would be hurt worse if it were born--if the mother didn't want it or were physically, financially, mentally, or emotionally incapable of raising a child. There are also situations where it would be medically unsafe for the mother to have the baby. I think it comes down to this: Abortion is, quite simply, a lose-lose situation. The child could be hurt whether it is born or not, and the mother could be hurt whether it's born or not. As there is no standard, no hard and fast rule, the government cannot possibly regulate it. As such, it should be the decision of the mother, and only the decision of the mother.
And, a
[
Poll #413015]