Oh, scoring questions again, that didn't raise up last time.
As you so notably pointed out, I have twice doubled my goal. I thought originally the up-the-goal-if-doubled-thing applied to when the team members all doubled their goals, but having it on individuals works for me.
Secondly, are we simply doing "if goal doubled or greater, 3 pts (individual)" or were we going for the percentage thing (add a point for every 100% exceeded)?
We're going to have to rewrite/reword the rules to make more sense (they might be a bit fuzzy right now).
And I'm swearing a bit, I think I messed something up on the last point total - I forgot to give a member their 1 point for making their goal by having others cover for them. >< So, we would've had team 3 with 9 points instead of 8.
Hehe...tonight I'm meeting Rodrigo. :) Adios for now.
I was actually thinking it was for individuals, so they couldn't constantly get the exceeding their goals bonus without working very hard, although I apparently wasn't clear on that in writing the rules or talking to you. Whichever was you want is fine with me, it's not a huge deal.
Secondly, are we simply doing "if goal doubled or greater, 3 pts (individual)" or were we going for the percentage thing (add a point for every 100% exceeded)?
I was thinking of the first when we put that in, but, the second would work too. OMG, I'm so wishy-washy tonight! Heh.
No, I thought that if someone covered for them, they didn't get the one point. Um. Am I confused?
Wait, now I remember, yes, we decided no goal=no point. Forgot about that , amidst the other questions. So I did calculate right. Since we have in the rules set for teams, we'll stick with that for August, but we can change it for September.
I can't satisfactorily give you an opinion right now on the 3pt vs. %%% issue, so what is your decision on that situation? We can easily default to the 3-points-and-leave-it. :)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: Writemore
Date: 2005-08-15 10:15 pm (UTC)Her journal is f-locked for commenting... >_
Re: Writemore
Date: 2005-08-15 11:22 pm (UTC)So, team1=two people? All right. Sounds ok to me.
Re: Writemore
Date: 2005-08-15 11:36 pm (UTC)As you so notably pointed out, I have twice doubled my goal. I thought originally the up-the-goal-if-doubled-thing applied to when the team members all doubled their goals, but having it on individuals works for me.
Secondly, are we simply doing "if goal doubled or greater, 3 pts (individual)" or were we going for the percentage thing (add a point for every 100% exceeded)?
Re: Writemore
Date: 2005-08-15 11:49 pm (UTC)We're going to have to rewrite/reword the rules to make more sense (they might be a bit fuzzy right now).
And I'm swearing a bit, I think I messed something up on the last point total - I forgot to give a member their 1 point for making their goal by having others cover for them. >< So, we would've had team 3 with 9 points instead of 8.
Hehe...tonight I'm meeting Rodrigo. :) Adios for now.
Re: Writemore
Date: 2005-08-15 11:52 pm (UTC)Secondly, are we simply doing "if goal doubled or greater, 3 pts (individual)" or were we going for the percentage thing (add a point for every 100% exceeded)?
I was thinking of the first when we put that in, but, the second would work too. OMG, I'm so wishy-washy tonight! Heh.
No, I thought that if someone covered for them, they didn't get the one point. Um. Am I confused?
Oooh, Rodrigo! Tell me more when you get back!
Re: Writemore
Date: 2005-08-16 03:22 am (UTC)I can't satisfactorily give you an opinion right now on the 3pt vs. %%% issue, so what is your decision on that situation? We can easily default to the 3-points-and-leave-it. :)
Re: Writemore
Date: 2005-08-16 02:51 pm (UTC)